About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ESMA Delays SI Implementation for Derivatives by Six Months

Subscribe to our newsletter

ESMA has pushed back the systematic internaliser (SI) implementation dates for derivatives by six months due to concerns over a lack of data completeness among market participants. The delay – to March 1, 2019 – mirrors the earlier treatment of MiFID II derivatives rules on open access, which were deferred from January 2018 to January 2020 by regulators in France, Germany and the UK following representations from some of the world’s biggest exchanges.

The new schedule for SI regime calculations and publications, announced today by ESMA, postpones the publication date for information on for exchange-traded commodities, exchange-traded notes, securities futures products, securitised derivatives, emission allowances and derivatives to February 1, 2019, covering the period from July 1 to December 31, 2018. SIs will have to comply with obligations by March 1 – a delay of six months from the original deadline of September 1, 2018.

For equity-like and bond instruments the current schedule remains the same. ESMA will publish information on the total number and the volume of transactions executed in the EU for the first time by August 1, 2018, covering the period from January 3 to 30 June, 2018. Investment firms will have to undertake their first assessment and, where necessary, comply with SI obligations by September 1, 2018.

ESMA will only publish results if trading venues have submitted data for at least 95% of all trading days and if the quality of data is considered to be “sufficient.” Following the initial publication, data will be published on a quarterly basis in respect of a rolling six months assessment period. Investment firms are expected to self-assess and, should they exceed the relative thresholds, comply with the relevant SI-specific obligations within a reduced two-week period.

“For the SI calculations, having a high level of completeness in the reported information is crucial,” warned the regulator.

ESMA originally decided to compute the total volume and number of transactions executed in the EU in order to assist market participants, as that data is essential for the operation of the SI regime and is not otherwise easily available. However, according to today’s announcement, data completeness for the various asset classes had not reached adequate levels when ESMA conducted its first completeness check of the data available in the system for the period January 3 to June 1, 2018.

“Based on this work, ESMA has liaised with NCAs and trading venues to increase the completeness rate as quickly as possible,” said the regulator.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Generative and Agentic AI in Financial Markets: What the Data Really Shows

Date: 15 October 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Artificial intelligence is reshaping financial markets – but the reality on the ground is more nuanced, more uneven, and more instructive than the headlines suggest. A new A-Team Insight research programme, drawing on responses from senior AI decision-makers at...

BLOG

FINOS Puts Common Domain Model (CDM) 7 into Production

In July, the FinTech Open Source Foundation (FINOS) released CDM 7 on GitHub consolidating more than 130 individual upgrades and development releases and followed up with a detailed analysis on August 14. The analysis was authored by Lionel Smith-Gordon and Ben Page of REGnosys, an active corporate member and key technology contributor to FINOS. The...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 10th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...