About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

EMIR Reporting Continues to Pose Data Management Challenge

Subscribe to our newsletter

The reporting requirements of European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) continue to challenge financial institutions six months after they came into force and ahead of regulatory intent to fine firms that fail to report correctly under the regulation. Industry estimates suggest that, to date, only 1% of trades have been correctly matched under EMIR due to the complexity of reporting using both Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs) and Unique Trade Identifiers (UTIs), and the need to complete over 85 new reporting fields.

Stephen Engdahl, Senior Vice President of GoldenSource, says it was only after firms began to submit reports that regulators began to understand the scale of the data management issue involved in EMIR. He explains: “This is not the first time we have seen regulators ask for information to be provided and then be unprepared to deal with it. From the perspective of firms that must comply with EMIR, there is a need for more clarification around how data for EMIR should be reported.”

Unlike Dodd-Frank reporting in the US, Engdahl notes that EMIR requires reporting on both sides of a transaction. He says: “When both parties report a transaction under EMIR, there needs to be consistency in the information they provide and the way they provide it. The regulation requires one half of the transaction to be matched to the other half to allow regulatory bodies to understand exposure of institutions to each other in the event that one of them fails.”

In terms of the LEI, the difficulty many firms experience is mapping the identifier to counterparty and client data systems. Engdahl suggests the need here is to centralise entity data and create an entity master that can ease the mapping issue. Going through this process, firms have realised that storing information on securities issuers, counterparties and clients in separate databases has made cross-referencing particularly problematic, especially when each of these databases have different on-boarding and data acquisition processes.

As a result, firms can struggle to recognise that the business entity they are dealing with might be an issuer of securities in one transaction while simultaneously being a counterparty or client in another, because each of the databases presents different identifiers and attributes that make it difficult to make connections.

The requirement for a common UTI between parties to a transaction can also cause reporting problems. Engdahl says that while there are some guidelines on use of the UTI from regulators, the lack of an overall standard has resulted in most transaction identifiers being based on bilateral agreements. Addressing this problem would require a significant regulatory review that Engdahl does not see happening in the short term.

GoldenSource is addressing the EMIR reporting problem with an entity master concept that sits behind core processing and customer relationship management systems, and allows firms to master entities using a platform that overlays existing infrastructure. When an update is made to one of the underlying databases, it is replicated in the entity master, avoiding cross-referencing mistakes and sustaining a common LEI. Engdahl says: “Our approach is to provide out-of-the-box capabilities so that our clients don’t have to handle business analysis, mapping rules and so on. They can access the entity data master from our download centre and apply it to their environment.”

Looking forward, Engdahl does not expect any fundamental changes to be made to UTIs, but does suggest that administration of the LEI by a central authority within the Global LEI System will assist with its implementation and use going forward.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The time is now for buy-side firms to re-evaluate their approach to data management

Increased cost pressures, rising volumes of data, and the challenges of legacy systems are pushing buy-side firms to re-evaluate current approaches to data management. The aim is cost-effective, optimised data management that can provide flexibility and scalability, support various data types including ESG data, and ensure headroom for development in line with business objectives. Achieving...

BLOG

FINRA Outlines Perspective on RegTech

RegTech innovation is commendable, but must be accompanied by risk mitigation, seen as a means to an end rather than an end in itself, and selected for use by a cross-section of an organisation that is inclusive of, but not limited to, IT and compliance. Opening A-Team Group’s RegTech Summit New York with a keynote...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 12th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in New York brings together the North American, capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore the evolution of data strategy and how to leverage data to drive compliance and business insight.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2022/2023 – Tenth Edition

Welcome to the tenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a publication that has tracked new regulations, amendments, implementation and data management requirements as regulatory change has impacted global capital markets participants over the past 10 years. This edition of the handbook includes new regulations and highlights some of the major regulatory interventions challenging...