About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

EIOPA Publishes XBRL Template and Taxonomy Proposals for Solvency II Quantitative Reporting

Subscribe to our newsletter

The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), one of the three industry focused, European level bodies that was created at the start if the year, has released its proposals for XBRL-based templates and a new taxonomy to be used when sending quantitative reports to the regulator as part of their compliance requirements under Solvency II. Firms have until 7 September to provide feedback on the proposals, which are aimed at harmonising the data that must be submitted to regulators during the reporting process.

This technical consultation is aimed at garnering feedback from the industry about the XBRL taxonomy, the possible impacts firms will face during the implementation process, such as cost and resource implications, and the maintenance of the taxonomy post-implementation.

The taxonomy in these proposals is based on the templates that were informally consulted upon with EIOPA stakeholders in January this year. The regulator indicates that further work on the taxonomy will take place in the coming months and it plans to disclose the next version of the taxonomy simultaneously with the disclosure of the content of reporting templates, after approval by the board of supervisors in October. The regulator has developed a sample taxonomy that it says: “represents the different types of data organisation in the Solvency II quantitative reporting templates.”

As for the feedback itself, the regulator is aiming to ascertain the industry’s experience of using XBRL, the taxonomy’s relationship to business processes and whether the terms are used correctly within it. EIOPA is looking for feedback on all aspects of implementation in terms of the costs, resources and time impacts of the proposals. Given that XBRL has significantly less penetration in this sector in the European region, these estimates are likely to be fairly high.

On that note, the EDM vendor community has been eagerly awaiting the Solvency II deadline, given its focus on fostering data quality improvements within the insurance, pensions and asset management industries. Many vendors have been heavily promoting their capabilities to support the practitioner community as it moves towards compliance with the new directive, which is hailed by many as a portent of how Basel III might evolve in a practical sense.

EIOPA is looking for feedback to be sent back to consultation.taxonomy­201107@eiopa.europa.eu in the templates provided in the paper.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Executing the Migration to Cloud to Enable Scalability and Innovation

Date: 22 September 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Cloud-based services and processing have become essential to financial institutions as their data management demands have become more complex and expansive. Thousands of organisations have made the jump from their limited on-premises tech stacks to the near-infinite scalability opportunities...

BLOG

AI May Well be a Big Accelerator, But Let’s Not Forget the Destination

By Chris Livesey, chief executive of AutoRek. Across the financial services software landscape, vendors and end-user customers are chasing a new goal, in how fast they can AI-ify or agentify everything that moves to claim unique differentiation and plant a flag for their brand as a market leader. We’ve seen this cycle many times before, for example with internet, cloud...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...