About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Developing a Benchmark for Latency

Subscribe to our newsletter

FIX Protocol Limited (FPL) is the non-profit, global industry organisation focused on driving increased efficiencies and cost savings for the trading community. FPL is a membership-driven organisation that works closely with firms across the globe to develop standards that address the real business challenges impacting trading capabilities. The organisation has recently turned its attention to latency measurement.

The low-latency arms race is now well underway, and firms across the industry frequency publish ever-decreasing latency levels; however, without a common benchmark for latency measurement, what do these numbers really mean, and to what degree are comparisons possible?

The current situation is rather confusing. There are many points in the transaction of a trade where latency could be measured. If one broker or exchange publishes numbers from one point, and another a different point, developing meaningful comparisons can prove challenging. This issue is amplified by the fact that latency is often quoted as a single number; whilst the latency of a single order can be reflected as a single number, the reality is that exchanges process many thousands of orders each day, some of which are faster than others. This creates a distribution curve, from which the probability of a trade taking a specific time to complete can be calculated.  These distribution curves normally peak and then have a long tail due to many trades being completed in a timely manner but problems that cause delays occur with the remaining few.

Unsurprisingly, the latency numbers often quoted relate to the trades that achieved the strongest results and this can be just a small proportion of those overall. This raises the question: could it be more beneficial if market participants were able to view a standardised set of statistics, so the results achieved by one firm could be directly compared with those of another?

A further challenge for consideration is that of disparate locations: to measure latency in different locations, a timing device is needed at either end of the communications link. These devices need to communicate with each other, so they can record the time at which a trade passes through the first device and then the time at which the same trade passes through the second device, to calculate how long it has taken. To date, all of the vendor supplied solutions available for this have used proprietary communication protocols.

Keen to address these challenges and increase efficiencies in this area, FPL launched the FIX Inter-Party Latency (FIXIPL)Working Group in late 2010. This group, comprised of volunteers from firms across the industry, quickly became FPL’s largest membership group, clearly demonstrating the significance of the issues under review. Since its formation, group members have worked diligently to address these issues. The group is developing the first free, open and non-proprietary industry standard that that will enable the consistent measurement of a trade as it travels through various systems at exchanges, trading venues and investment banks. Additional to this, a set of industry guidelines will be produced which will encourage common latency reporting at identified points throughout the trade lifecycle, on a defined set of criteria, and including a specific minimum acceptable set of statistics.

Testing of the new standard was recently conducted in three independent real-world environments by separate FPL member firms. Additional testing is now underway to incorporate further functionality that will meet all comprehensive business needs and ensure the standard effectively supports industry requirements when it is released to the market in Q4 2011.

FPL anticipates the standard will offer a new level of support to market participants, providing a much-needed benchmark for latency measurement, and the industry as a whole has expressed enthusiasm for its release.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Smart Trader Desktops: Placing UX at the front and centre of the trading workflow

Trading strategy is in place, the technology stack is optimised and the trading team is highly skilled – but what about the user experience? Whatever the stack, the desktop, the trading apps and their functionality, a trading platform is only as good as its user interface (UI) and user experience (UX). This webinar will review...

BLOG

London Stock Exchange Group Acquires Veris Post-Trade Processing Business from Axoni

Trade workflow applications and real-time data replication technology provider Axoni has agreed to sell its post-trade processing business and related intellectual property to the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG). Launched in 2020, Veris is a post-trade reconciliation and lifecycle management platform for equity swaps, used by leading banks and asset managers. The platform streamlines data...

EVENT

ESG Data & Tech Briefing London

The ESG Data & Tech Briefing will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

Institutional Digital Assets Handbook 2024

Despite the setback of the FTX collapse, institutional interest in digital assets has grown markedly in the past 12 months, with firms of all sizes now acknowledging participation in some form. While as recently as a year ago, institutional trading firms were taking a cautious stance toward their use, the acceptance of tokenisation, stablecoins, and...