About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Developing a Benchmark for Latency

Subscribe to our newsletter

FIX Protocol Limited (FPL) is the non-profit, global industry organisation focused on driving increased efficiencies and cost savings for the trading community. FPL is a membership-driven organisation that works closely with firms across the globe to develop standards that address the real business challenges impacting trading capabilities. The organisation has recently turned its attention to latency measurement.

The low-latency arms race is now well underway, and firms across the industry frequency publish ever-decreasing latency levels; however, without a common benchmark for latency measurement, what do these numbers really mean, and to what degree are comparisons possible?

The current situation is rather confusing. There are many points in the transaction of a trade where latency could be measured. If one broker or exchange publishes numbers from one point, and another a different point, developing meaningful comparisons can prove challenging. This issue is amplified by the fact that latency is often quoted as a single number; whilst the latency of a single order can be reflected as a single number, the reality is that exchanges process many thousands of orders each day, some of which are faster than others. This creates a distribution curve, from which the probability of a trade taking a specific time to complete can be calculated.  These distribution curves normally peak and then have a long tail due to many trades being completed in a timely manner but problems that cause delays occur with the remaining few.

Unsurprisingly, the latency numbers often quoted relate to the trades that achieved the strongest results and this can be just a small proportion of those overall. This raises the question: could it be more beneficial if market participants were able to view a standardised set of statistics, so the results achieved by one firm could be directly compared with those of another?

A further challenge for consideration is that of disparate locations: to measure latency in different locations, a timing device is needed at either end of the communications link. These devices need to communicate with each other, so they can record the time at which a trade passes through the first device and then the time at which the same trade passes through the second device, to calculate how long it has taken. To date, all of the vendor supplied solutions available for this have used proprietary communication protocols.

Keen to address these challenges and increase efficiencies in this area, FPL launched the FIX Inter-Party Latency (FIXIPL)Working Group in late 2010. This group, comprised of volunteers from firms across the industry, quickly became FPL’s largest membership group, clearly demonstrating the significance of the issues under review. Since its formation, group members have worked diligently to address these issues. The group is developing the first free, open and non-proprietary industry standard that that will enable the consistent measurement of a trade as it travels through various systems at exchanges, trading venues and investment banks. Additional to this, a set of industry guidelines will be produced which will encourage common latency reporting at identified points throughout the trade lifecycle, on a defined set of criteria, and including a specific minimum acceptable set of statistics.

Testing of the new standard was recently conducted in three independent real-world environments by separate FPL member firms. Additional testing is now underway to incorporate further functionality that will meet all comprehensive business needs and ensure the standard effectively supports industry requirements when it is released to the market in Q4 2011.

FPL anticipates the standard will offer a new level of support to market participants, providing a much-needed benchmark for latency measurement, and the industry as a whole has expressed enthusiasm for its release.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Navigating the Build vs Buy Dilemma: Cloud Strategies for Accelerating Quantitative Research

Date: 20 May 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes For many quantitative trading firms and asset managers, building a self-provisioned historical market data environment remains one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps in establishing a new research capability. Sourcing data, normalising symbologies, handling corporate actions and maintaining...

BLOG

SIX Selects Aquis Technologies to Harmonise Trading Platforms and Partners with viaNexus to Enhance Market Data Distribution

SIX, the operator of the Swiss and Spanish stock exchanges, is embarking on a significant technological transformation, announcing two strategic technology initiatives set to reshape its trading and data distribution infrastructure. Following its completion of the Aquis acquisition earlier this year, the group has now selected Aquis Technologies to harmonise its trading platforms across all...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Summit in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2019/2020 – Seventh Edition

Welcome to A-Team Group’s best read handbook, the Regulatory Data Handbook, which is now in its seventh edition and continues to grow in terms of the number of regulations covered, the detail of each regulation and the impact that all the rules and regulations will have on data and data management at your institution. This...