About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Costs of Living Wills Requirements Likely to be Considerable But Are Hard to Estimate, Says Kinetic Partners’ Shrimpton

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has just released a new consultation paper on its proposals for recovery and resolution planning requirements, which estimates that the direct costs of implementation will be between £4 million and £35 million for “high impact” firms and the ongoing compliance costs to the industry will be between £150 million and £400 million. Andrew Shrimpton, member at financial advisory firm Kinetic Partners, explains to Reference Data Review that the true costs of the changes are likely to be considerable, but are hard to determine fully at this point in time.

“Firms will be faced with a considerable expense in preparing the plans and structures necessary to meet the FSA’s requirements, however, it is difficult to estimate at this stage exactly what the costs will be,” says Shrimpton.

On this note, he indicates that the resolution plan requirements are much harder to quantify than recovery plan requirements. “Recovery plans can be implemented fairly quickly, and become part of management’s ongoing contingency planning, without extensive additional cost to the firm. The resolution plan requirements, however, are completely new, and experience of other new regulations previously implemented suggests that the costs stated could be underestimates,” he explains.

Firms won’t have long to find out the initial implementation costs, given that the FSA is planning to publish the final rules in the first quarter of next year. At that point certain provisions will come into effect that will mean firms will be required to submit the first draft of their recovery and resolution plans in June 2012. Firms will therefore have six months to get the necessary data infrastructure in place to be able to pull together the required data on demand.

“Firms will have to go through many iterations and likely seek expensive external advice to ensure they have met all the requirements,” adds Shrimpton.

Back in November 2009, Fed board governor Daniel Tarullo indicated that in order to meet living wills requirements firms will need sufficiently robust data management systems in place to track data quality and provide audit trails for regulators. He therefore noted that a “very significant upgrade of management information systems (MIS) may be the only way for the firm to satisfy living will requirements”.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Executing the Migration to Cloud to Enable Scalability and Innovation

Cloud-based services and processing have become essential to financial institutions as their data management demands have become more complex and expansive. Thousands of organisations have made the jump from their limited on-premises tech stacks to the near-infinite scalability opportunities of public and private clouds. They have also been motivated by the need to modernise their...

BLOG

Agentic AI’s Data Quality Imperative: AI in Capital Markets Summit Review

Artificial intelligence agents are not only changing the way organisations deploy new technology, they are also throwing new challenges to data managers as the autonomous structures place new demands on their infrastructure. It’s not enough that AI needs good-quality data to generate and perform the most accurate and safest outputs; agents are also prompting a...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, Spring, New York, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 9th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...