About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Costs of Living Wills Requirements Likely to be Considerable But Are Hard to Estimate, Says Kinetic Partners’ Shrimpton

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has just released a new consultation paper on its proposals for recovery and resolution planning requirements, which estimates that the direct costs of implementation will be between £4 million and £35 million for “high impact” firms and the ongoing compliance costs to the industry will be between £150 million and £400 million. Andrew Shrimpton, member at financial advisory firm Kinetic Partners, explains to Reference Data Review that the true costs of the changes are likely to be considerable, but are hard to determine fully at this point in time.

“Firms will be faced with a considerable expense in preparing the plans and structures necessary to meet the FSA’s requirements, however, it is difficult to estimate at this stage exactly what the costs will be,” says Shrimpton.

On this note, he indicates that the resolution plan requirements are much harder to quantify than recovery plan requirements. “Recovery plans can be implemented fairly quickly, and become part of management’s ongoing contingency planning, without extensive additional cost to the firm. The resolution plan requirements, however, are completely new, and experience of other new regulations previously implemented suggests that the costs stated could be underestimates,” he explains.

Firms won’t have long to find out the initial implementation costs, given that the FSA is planning to publish the final rules in the first quarter of next year. At that point certain provisions will come into effect that will mean firms will be required to submit the first draft of their recovery and resolution plans in June 2012. Firms will therefore have six months to get the necessary data infrastructure in place to be able to pull together the required data on demand.

“Firms will have to go through many iterations and likely seek expensive external advice to ensure they have met all the requirements,” adds Shrimpton.

Back in November 2009, Fed board governor Daniel Tarullo indicated that in order to meet living wills requirements firms will need sufficiently robust data management systems in place to track data quality and provide audit trails for regulators. He therefore noted that a “very significant upgrade of management information systems (MIS) may be the only way for the firm to satisfy living will requirements”.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Unpacking Stablecoin Challenges for Financial Institutions

The stablecoin market is experiencing unprecedented growth, driven by emerging regulatory clarity, technological maturity, and rising global demand for a faster, more secure financial infrastructure. But with opportunity comes complexity, and a host of challenges that financial institutions need to address before they can unlock the promise of a more streamlined financial transaction ecosystem. These...

BLOG

Ataccama Gathers Data Capabilities into Focused EU AI Act Package

As the implementation date for the European Union’s AI Act looms, financial institutions are having to put their data estates on a secure footing to ensure they comply with the wide-ranging regulation. The Act requires organisations to have a broad and granular view of their data in order to show that they can trace any...

EVENT

ExchangeTech Summit London

A-Team Group, organisers of the TradingTech Summits, are pleased to announce the inaugural ExchangeTech Summit London on May 14th 2026. This dedicated forum brings together operators of exchanges, alternative execution venues and digital asset platforms with the ecosystem of vendors driving the future of matching engines, surveillance and market access.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...