About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Costs of Living Wills Requirements Likely to be Considerable But Are Hard to Estimate, Says Kinetic Partners’ Shrimpton

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has just released a new consultation paper on its proposals for recovery and resolution planning requirements, which estimates that the direct costs of implementation will be between £4 million and £35 million for “high impact” firms and the ongoing compliance costs to the industry will be between £150 million and £400 million. Andrew Shrimpton, member at financial advisory firm Kinetic Partners, explains to Reference Data Review that the true costs of the changes are likely to be considerable, but are hard to determine fully at this point in time.

“Firms will be faced with a considerable expense in preparing the plans and structures necessary to meet the FSA’s requirements, however, it is difficult to estimate at this stage exactly what the costs will be,” says Shrimpton.

On this note, he indicates that the resolution plan requirements are much harder to quantify than recovery plan requirements. “Recovery plans can be implemented fairly quickly, and become part of management’s ongoing contingency planning, without extensive additional cost to the firm. The resolution plan requirements, however, are completely new, and experience of other new regulations previously implemented suggests that the costs stated could be underestimates,” he explains.

Firms won’t have long to find out the initial implementation costs, given that the FSA is planning to publish the final rules in the first quarter of next year. At that point certain provisions will come into effect that will mean firms will be required to submit the first draft of their recovery and resolution plans in June 2012. Firms will therefore have six months to get the necessary data infrastructure in place to be able to pull together the required data on demand.

“Firms will have to go through many iterations and likely seek expensive external advice to ensure they have met all the requirements,” adds Shrimpton.

Back in November 2009, Fed board governor Daniel Tarullo indicated that in order to meet living wills requirements firms will need sufficiently robust data management systems in place to track data quality and provide audit trails for regulators. He therefore noted that a “very significant upgrade of management information systems (MIS) may be the only way for the firm to satisfy living will requirements”.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Hearing from the Experts: AI Governance Best Practices

The rapid spread of artificial intelligence in the financial industry presents data teams with novel challenges. AI’s ability to harvest and utilize vast amounts of data has raised concerns about the privacy and security of sensitive proprietary data and the ethical and legal use of external information. Robust data governance frameworks provide the guardrails needed...

BLOG

ISDA Finds GenAI Highly Accurate in Contracts Process but Stresses Need for Good Data

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) has found that a range of generative artificial intelligence models can achieve a very high level of accuracy in extracting and standardising contract details into digital form. The findings suggest that AI can be deployed to reduce time and resources as well as risks when processing data within...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 15th year the Data Management Summit NYC brings together the North American data management community to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2025 – Thirteenth Edition

Welcome to the thirteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a unique and practical guide to capital markets regulation, regulatory change, and the data and data management requirements of compliance across Europe, the UK, US and Asia-Pacific. This year’s edition lands at a moment of accelerating regulatory divergence and intensifying data focused supervision. Inside,...