About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

CloudMargin Expands Custodian Network as More Firms Come into UMR Scope

Subscribe to our newsletter

Collateral management technology provider CloudMargin has expanded its network to include close to 60 custodians, following the start of Phase 5 of the Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) this month and ahead of even more buy-side firms falling under the scope of Phase 6 next year.

On September 1, asset managers with an Aggregated Average Notional Amount (AANA) of more than €50 billion were required to post initial margin with their counterparties for uncleared derivatives, with many doing so for the first time. Simon Millington, Head of Business Development at CloudMargin, says that although UMR has been phased in for a number of years now, Phase 5 is the first time that there are buy-side firms falling under the new regime who have typically been more cash and security-oriented and did not have the need to use triparty agents in the past.

“They want to add third-party custodians to their existing custody relationships, but there are a few differences involved with that,” he says. “We’ve been supporting those clients which fall under Phase 5 in managing those changes, mainly around the need to match instructions and send different types of messages to those custodians to invoke those transfers. There are also different requirements depending on the custodian, so we’ve also been doing a lot of work to try and standardise the messaging that needs to be sent. We aim to make the collateral management process as automated as possible.”

While firms are able to select their own custodians in the exchange of initial margin (IM), they can’t pick those of their counterparties. Having access to a broad network of nearly 60 custodians via CloudMargin, Millington says, increases the likelihood that their preferred counterparties are covered. He adds that for banks in particular, with a large number of in-scope counterparties, this capability can significantly reduce their connectivity burden. CloudMargin has also ensured that its system can operate with those custodians based on the models that were set forth and agreed by the ISDA members. The network of custodians is available to CloudMargin clients and their partners out-of-the-box for third-party Swift settlement, while the provider also has Swift connectivity to the four major triparty agents.

“We found that for many of the new Phase 5 clients, most processes across the entire workflow were a new challenge for them, particularly when it came to settlement,” Millington says. “Phase 5 was really the first time that a lot of firms were exchanging initial margin of any kind, it was the first time that many clients were introduced to triparty agents and, in some cases, it was the first time that certain clients were being introduced to security settlement, so there were a lot of challenges all the way through.”

While Phase 5 has proved to be a learning experience for many in the industry, Millington warns that the challenge may be even greater for Phase 6 because it will involve substantially more institutions, including some firms coming into scope who have potentially less sophisticated technology. “We would definitely encourage any firm that comes into scope with Phase 6, or believes they will, to start preparing now. A year can go by very quickly and we’re certainly encouraging our existing clients who we know are going to be Phase 6 to start that process now, to look at how that will operate and start to have conversations with their counterparts and obviously the other industry utilities around this as well. There was a bit of a rush to the finish for Phase 5, and we expect the same for Phase 6.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content


Recorded Webinar: Market Abuse Regulation: How to Detect and Analyse Abusive Market Transactions

Market abuse is a potential problem for many financial institutions. It typically covers insider dealing, unlawful disclosure of inside information, and market manipulation, and is often difficult to detect and report in line with regulations such as Market Abuse Regulation – or MAR, and its UK equivalent. While compliance with MAR is a challenge, non-compliance...


Can the RegTech Segment Shrug Off the Collapse of SVB and its Collateral Damage?

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and the resulting damage to confidence in the banking sector – which may have sparked the unravelling of Credit Suisse – has roiled markets globally. It’s also led to fears about the future of the FinTech and RegTech suppliers. With many suppliers in the California tech space and...


Data Management Summit London

Now in its 13th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.


Corporate Actions 2009 Edition

Rather than detracting attention away from corporate actions automation projects, the financial crisis appears to have accentuated the importance of the vital nature of this data. Financial institutions are more aware than ever before of the impact that inaccurate corporate actions data has on their bottom lines as a result of the increased focus on...