About a-team Marketing Services

A-Team Insight Blogs

BCBS Says Bank Compliance with Risk Aggregation Principles is Unsatisfactory

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) reports that the level of compliance with its principles for effective risk data aggregation and reporting is unsatisfactory at globally systematically important banks (G-SIBS). It urges the banks to step up their efforts and recommends that they should develop clear roadmaps to achieve full compliance, supervisors should communicate assessment results with individual banks to incentivise them to achieve compliance, and that the Basel Committee should continue to monitor implementation of the principles.

The report, Progress in Adopting the Principles for Effective Risk Data Aggregation and Risk Reporting (RDARR), was published in late March and discusses the progress banks identified as G-SIBS in 2011 and 2012 have made in complying with the RDARR principles set down in January 2013 and monitored by the Basel Committee.

The report acknowledges some progress on compliance, but states: “The latest assessments by supervisors show that banks’ level of compliance is unsatisfactory and the overall implementation progress remains a source of concern to supervisors . . . Based on supervisors’ assessments, only one bank fully complied with the principles, even though the implementation deadline for G-SIBs identified in 2011 and 2012 had lapsed in January 2016.”

The key challenge in achieving compliance is noted as Principle 2, data architecture and IT infrastructure. This concerns supervisors as it is a precondition, along with Principle 1 on governance, to ensure compliance with the other principles.

The report lists outstanding technical challenges faced by banks implementing the principles as: difficulties in execution and management of complex and large-scale IT and data infrastructure projects; overreliance on manual processes and interventions to produce risk reports, although some manual processes are unavoidable; incomplete integration and implementation of bank-wide data architecture and frameworks; and weaknesses in data quality controls.

Charlie Browne, head of market data and risk solutions at GoldenSource, suggests the shortfall in compliance with the BCBS principles results from banks continuing to operate silos of risk data that make it difficult to achieve fast and effective data aggregation. He says: “Multiple copies of risk data lead to performance issues such as running calculations more times than necessary and increased reconciliation. If all risk data is aggregated properly, a consistent set of calculations can be run across regulations, providing firms with efficiencies and regulators with an improved view of risk calculations.”

Considering the outcomes of the supervisors’ assessment of banks’ compliance with the BCBS principles, the report concludes that, in general, banks will take about five to six years to achieve full compliance, assuming they started implementation when the principles were published in January 2013.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to simplify and modernize data architecture to unleash data value and innovation

The data needs of financial institutions are growing at pace as new formats and greater volumes of information are integrated into their systems. With this has come greater complexity in managing and governing that data, amplifying pain points along data pipelines. In response, innovative new streamlined and flexible architectures have emerged that can absorb and...

BLOG

SmartStream Chief Jaffer Sees Rapid Change in Year at Helm

Just over a year into his tenure as chief executive of financial data automation provider SmartStream, Akber Jaffer finds himself surveying a data industry that’s changed enormously over his short time at the UK-based company. Chat GPT was a year old when he took on his new role and the artificial intelligence (AI) technology’s revolutionary...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit New York

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...