About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Basel IV FRTB Changes Leave Financial Institutions Asking: How Do You Spell Difficult? “F-R-T-B”

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Mahim Mehra, Senior Risk Advisor, AxiomSL.

With the original introduction of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) completely rewrote the rules used to determine how much capital financial institutions must hold in order to adequately capitalize their exposure to market risk. The previous FRTB changes replaced the existing standardized approach with a new calculation methodology, changing the way in which model approval was granted and monitored. Value-at-risk (VAR) was replaced with expected shortfall (ES) and the boundary between the banking and trading books was literally hard coded.

There have been changes yet again to the original rules and the deadline for the new FRTB implementation is 2023. However, certain jurisdictions (i.e., CRR2 in Europe) may have to report market risk under the new FRTB guidelines sooner. So, while full FRTB implementation may seem far away on the Basel journey, it is not. Financial institutions must meet several requirements as they prepare for full compliance with Basel IV and at national levels before the final deadline — and these need to be addressed immediately.

Double, Double Toil And Trouble

As per guidance from regulators at the national level, firms will soon be expected to implement processes and begin capitalizing and reporting according to these new FRTB standards. Financial institutions can do this according to Standardized Approach (SA), or the Internal Model Approach (IMA).  As they prepare for major changes in their calculations and struggle to accommodate Basel IV and the recent FRTB changes, organizations are faced with critical decisions about data governance, risk management, calculation changes, and efficiencies. Unlike the witches of Macbeth, they can’t simply make these problems go away by casting a spell.

The new approach essentially overhauls the existing one to, arguably, better reflect the level of market risk to which individual financial institutions are exposed. It is much more detailed and sophisticated and requires firms to perform more calculations, resulting in increased data requirements. And whether they want to or not, most will need to increase capital in order to support their trading activities.

As they cope with FRTB changes and address how to accommodate them, institutions are asking critical questions, including:

  • Can our current architecture handle the large volume of valuations and reconciliations required to determine the appropriate IMA-related profit and loss attribution?
  • Can we accommodate both IMA and SA calculations?
  • Are we making business decisions based on sound risk and governance principles or are we reacting to the output floor?
  • Are the new required data sets (including the relevant sensitivities) under SA integrated seamlessly into our calculation engine and reporting requirements?
  • Can we absorb the additional IT / finance / risk and resource burden?

One Fell Swoop

With the extensive Basel III reforms, now referred to as Basel IV, financial institutions are faced with tackling a multi-faceted problem all at once.

Could this be a chance to strategically address several critical questions in one fell swoop?

Financial institutions require transparent data, robust analytics, a scalable, technology-driven approach, and end-to-end processes that enable confident compliance. And as global financial markets adjust to a new normal after COVID-19 disruptions, it is even more important than ever for financial institutions to have transparency into their data, calculations and risk, be able to optimize efficiencies, and be prepared to manage change across their organizations.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practice approaches to trade surveillance for market abuse

Breaches of market abuse regulation can lead to reputational damage, eye-watering fines and, ultimately, custodial sentences of up to 10 years. Internally, market abuse triggers scrutiny of traders and trading behaviours; externally it can undermine confidence in markets and cause financial instability. This webinar will discuss market abuse of different types, such as insider trading...

BLOG

Platinum Asset Management Selects NeoXam for NextGen Target Operating Model

Platinum Asset Management, an Australia based global equity manager, is planning to upgrade its data and technology capabilities with NeoXam’s DataHub integrated solutions for investment data, performance measurement, and Impress client reporting. The NeoXam data management platform will be deployed to manage reference, market, and investment data within a single, centralised enterprise repository. This will...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 13th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

FATCA – The Time to Act is Now

The US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act – aka FATCA – raised eyebrows when its final regulations requiring foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to report US accounts to US tax authorities were published last year. But with the exception of a few modifications, the legislation remains in place and starts to comes into force in earnest...