About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Asset Owners Change Approach to Risk Management

Subscribe to our newsletter

MSCI, a leading provider of investment decision support tools worldwide, published today the results of its 2011 Global Asset Owners Survey: Back to the Future of Risk Management. With 85 participants from 26 countries, representing roughly USD 5.5 trillion in assets under management, this is one of the most in-depth surveys to look at risk management trends, as well as current and future risk management practices. Participants from a wide variety of firms include, AP 2/Andra AP-Fonden (AP2), AP3 Tredje AP-fonden (AP3), Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC), AustralianSuper Pty Ltd, British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (bcIMC) and Workers’ Compensation Board – Alberta.

“The results of our survey clearly show a continued evolution through these uncertain market times with a greater focus on risk management and with more resources dedicated to measuring and managing risk,” said Frank Nielsen, Executive Director of Research at MSCI. “The results reflect how risk management has become both a high priority and a more formalized component of the overall investment process for our clients.”

Since MSCI’s inaugural 2009 survey, The Future of Market Risk Management, asset owner participants have updated their risk management best practices. Many have shortened their strategic asset allocation horizon, often from 3 years to 1 year, and the number of surveyed firms using stress testing has increased by almost 300% since 2009. Participants cited market risk, counterparty risk and liquidity risk as the top three risk concerns. Communication was also a theme – asset owners reported increased and more frequent communication between their risk team, Board and investment teams.

>Other key themes in the 2011 survey results include:

  • A paradigm shift of the risk management function as more resources are dedicated to the management and measurement of risk
  • Plan investment horizon and asset allocation decision making have become more dynamic
  • Stress testing and extreme (tail) risk hedging have become a very high priority
  • External management selection criteria largely depend on transparency and risk control as allocation to alternatives is increasing

The survey was conducted from May – August 2011 with 85 global participants. Interviews were carried out in person and using an on-line interface. Respondents were typically CIOs, CROs, Portfolio Managers, Senior Risk Analysts and Middle Office heads.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Unlocking value: Harnessing modern data platforms for data integration, advanced investment analytics, visualisation and reporting

Modern data platforms are bringing efficiencies, scalability and powerful new capabilities to institutions and their data pipelines. They are enabling the use of new automation and analytical technologies that are also helping firms to derive more value from their data and reduce costs. Use cases of specific importance to the finance sector, such as data...

BLOG

APAC Data Management Leaders Revealed in Inaugural A-Team Insight Awards Introduction

A-Team Group is pleased to announce the winners of the inaugural Capital Markets Technology APAC Awards 2025. These awards celebrate the technology providers and financial institutions at the forefront of innovation across the Asia Pacific region. Coinciding with the announcement, we have also launched our comprehensive annual report, “The State of Capital Markets Technology in...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Valuations – Toward On-Demand Evaluated Pricing

Risk and regulatory imperatives are demanding access to the latest portfolio information, placing new pressures on the pricing and valuation function. And the front office increasingly wants up-to-date valuations of hard-to-price securities. These developments are driving a push toward on-demand evaluated pricing capabilities, with pricing teams seeking to provide access to valuations at higher frequency...