About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ACA Adds SaaS Best Execution Solution to ComplianceAlpha Platform

Subscribe to our newsletter

ACA has added a best execution solution to its ComplianceAlpha RegTech platform. The solution is available as Software-as-a-Service and integrates with the platforms Employee Compliance and Market Abuse Surveillance solutions, as well as third-party systems.

The ACA solution is designed to help global firms facilitate the exchange of critical data and reduce the cost and time to complete required regulatory reports. To do this, it streamlines and automates the process of gathering quantitative and qualitative data needed to support best execution analysis and reporting. It can be used to meet global regulatory requirements of SEC Rules 110-1102, FINRA rule 5310, MSRB Rule G-18, and MiFID II.

“Regulators expect firms to demonstrate that they are consistently taking all sufficient steps to obtain the best possible results for their clients, including evaluating the execution performance of transactions,” says Patrick Conroy, partner at ACA. “Our ComplianceAlpha best execution solution helps clients meet these obligations by evaluating not only the cost of services received from their financial counterparties and service providers, but also the quality of those services.”

The solution outlines a set of recommended tasks for conducting a compliant best execution report. In addition to performing a transaction cost analysis, it allows firms to rank brokers on responsiveness, breadth of services, and other qualitative factors. “By integrating quantitative and qualitative data, we empower our clients to make informed decisions, evaluate broker performance, and fulfill their fiduciary duty diligently,” says Annie Morris, chief product officer at ACA Group.

While the UK no longer requires regulated firms to prepare certain best execution reports (RTS 27 relating to venues and RTS 28 for firms), the regulatory obligations to seek best execution for clients remain and form a central part of Treating Customers Fairly. The EU also deprioritised supervisory actions on non-publication of RTS 27, though the RTS 28 obligation for EU firms remains in place.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Sponsored by FundGuard: NAV Resilience Under DORA, A Year of Lessons Learned

The EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) came into force a year ago, and is reshaping how asset managers, asset owners and fund service providers think about operational risk. While DORA’s focus is squarely on ICT resilience and third-party dependencies, its implications extend deep into core operational processes that are critical to market integrity, investor...

BLOG

Funding Regulatory Oversight: 2026 Budgets for US Supervisors

On January 11, 2026, the House Appropriations Committee released conferenced versions of two major fiscal year 2026 spending measures: the Financial Services and General Government (FSGG) bill and the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs (NSRP) bill. While appropriations announcements rarely attract sustained market attention, these packages carry direct implications for how financial...

EVENT

AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Following the success of the 15th Data Management Summit NYC, A-Team Group are excited to announce our new event: AI in Data Management Summit NYC!

GUIDE

ESG Handbook 2023

The ESG Handbook 2023 edition is the essential guide to everything you need to know about ESG and how to manage requirements if you work in financial data and technology. Download your free copy to understand: What ESG Covers: The scope and definition of ESG Regulations: The evolution of global regulations, especially in the UK...