About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A Ticking Clock: The Tricky Issue of Timestamping for MiFID II

Subscribe to our newsletter

MiFID II has introduced rigorous new requirements for timestamping and clock synchronisation, forcing firms to overhaul existing technology and implement new systems to comply. Accuracy is everything – but how successful has the industry been in meeting the tighter demands? In advance of A-Team’s webinar on timestamping and clock synchronisation tomorrow, we take a quick look at the key challenges of implementation.

Although the deadline for MiFID II has come and gone, and compliance has in the main been achieved, the challenges of the regulation’s requirements are ongoing – particularly in terms of the choice of clock and the consistency of reporting.

“One of the biggest challenges firms have faced is the transfer of time from its source (i.e., UTC or NIST) to the timestamping point, and the accuracy in acquiring and applying the timestamp to the event,” confirms Russell Lowes, senior FPGA engineer at Metamako.

Beyond that, the problem is not just capturing an accurate time source but distributing it throughout the organisation and, of course, monitoring it to ensure it does not drift and that traceability can be demonstrated to the regulator.

“I think firms have had more issues with their own internal infrastructure, getting the design right, implementing it, managing it, and monitoring it,” comments Hugh Cumberland of Cumberland Caine. “Then they have to prove to the regulator that they have actually taken all those steps – that’s the really tricky bit.”

According to Rory Chisholm, IT Project manager for the FinfraG Art 38 & Art 39 programs at UBS Investment Bank, traceability and consistency have indeed been a challenge. “MiFID II calls for the time signal to be traceable and provable to an approved source. The challenge is having a design that can be audited, and a time signal that we can successfully prove remains within the boundaries. Another challenge was finding a solution for monitoring the distribution of the time signal so that if one proponent of the overall architecture fails, the appropriate support analysts are alerted.”

These bugs are gradually being worked out – but are there more to come? “Firms have been successful in working to the letter of the regulations, but have taken risks in that implementation,” warns Lowes. “Different methods of time transfer and application pose different probabilities of being correct within any given bound. Thus depending on the implementation selected, firms may not be strictly 100% covered.”

Cumberland agrees. “By and large, I think most firms are reasonably confident that should there be any kind of investigation, they would be able to demonstrate that the steps they have taken are sufficient. However, there are still some areas – particularly in the field of fixed income – where a lot of trading has moved from voice onto execution platforms, and there are still question marks as to where the timestamp is captured and what exactly is being stamped.”

But there are benefits as well as challenges to the new requirements. They have forced firms to review their systems and improve their functionality, and this has aided both transparency and accountability.

So was it all worth it?

“Perception is reality,” advises Cumberland. “The perception is that it was needed, and therefore it happened. So don’t implement it grudgingly, don’t implement it under protest or just as a tick in the box. Look for the upside – what else can you use it for? How can it help you understand the accuracy of your own environment? How can it help your analytics? You have spent a lot of money on a solution, so how can you leverage that from a business perspective?”

To learn more about the challenges and opportunities of timestamping and clock synchronization under MiFID II, listen to our recent webinar on the topic.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best Practices for Managing Trade Surveillance

1 July 2025 10:00am ET | 3:00pm London | 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 Minutes The surge in trading volumes combined with the emergence of new digital financial assets and geopolitical events have added layers of complexity to market activities. Traditional surveillance methods often struggle to keep pace with these changes, leading to difficulties in detecting...

BLOG

T+1 Settlement – Driving Behavioural and Technological Change in Post-Trade Operations

With the capital markets industry facing constant pressure to streamline operations and reduce costs, the shift towards a T+1 settlement cycle in Europe, including the UK and Switzerland, represents both a formidable challenge and a critical inflection point for post-trade processes. So what are the biggest risks facing firms ahead of this shift? How will...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...