About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

$2.7 BILLION!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Is it the government debt of a small former Eastern European country? No. Is it the total value of the European financial information business? Depends on who you ask, but that’s not what we’re thinking. Is it Mike Bloomberg’s 2009 dividend from the activities of his eponymous market data vendor business? Nah, too low.

No, $2.7 billion is the asking price for Interactive Data Corp. And it’s proving to be too rich for the remaining players in the game, we hear. Not only that, it’s twice what Standard & Poor’s, the last remaining trader contender, is willing to pay. While McGraw-Hill has overpaid in the past – muni broker JJ Kenny springs to mind – it apparently isn’t in the mood to do so right now.

As we’ve pointed out, an S&P acquisition would return Comstock to the fold. What we didn’t point out was that Interactive Data’s core pricing business was also spun out of S&P, where it was known as the Standard & Poor’s Price Tape & Punched Card Dividend Service, back around 1987. Clearly, $2.7 billion is a lot to pay to buy something back, even if it is a good fit; which it is.

This, some in the marketplace reckon, suggests that a private equity deal may win the day. And even then, the high price means that only Pearson’s 60% stake will change hands. The rest will stay where it is: with the investing public.

And what would a private equity player do with that 60%, one wonders? One theory is that it would be slowly sold into a burgeoning market, adding value as it goes. While that doesn’t sound a very glamorous outcome, the odds are that a deal will in fact be done. Pearson, it seems, is serious about getting out.

It would also entail Interactive Data’s standing on its own two feet – at least without the support of a trade parent – for the first time. After it bought the S&P pricing service, the company was sold by Chase bank back in 1989 to Dun & Bradstreet, where it remained until Pearson took its majority holding.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Cross-Regulation Data Consistency and Accuracy

Regulatory reporting obligations continue to expand, bringing with them more overlaps of data elements across reporting regimes. As many firms struggle with the accuracy and completeness of individual reporting obligations, regulators have increasingly begun to focus on cross-regulation data consistency in their data validations and examination processes. This webinar will identify cases of data overlap...

BLOG

Alveo Expands Relationship with FactSet to Offer Data-as-a-Service

Alveo has expanded its relationship with FactSet, which added FactSet ESG content to Alveo’s data management platform, with a collaboration that combines the companies’ data and data management capabilities to provide customers with solutions that integrate FactSet content into workflows and databases. The collaboration is designed to minimise time needed to onboard new data sets...

EVENT

A-Team Briefing: Cloud Innovation for Data Ops

This Innovation Briefing will explore approaches to data infrastructure transformation, technologies required and how to make sure processes are optimised to support real time data management. Hear from leading practitioners and innovative technology solution providers who will share insight into how to set up and leverage your data infrastructure to provide user access to consistent data and analytics, and companies the ability to monetise their data.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2022/2023 – Tenth Edition

Welcome to the tenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a publication that has tracked new regulations, amendments, implementation and data management requirements as regulatory change has impacted global capital markets participants over the past 10 years. This edition of the handbook includes new regulations and highlights some of the major regulatory interventions challenging...