The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Another Delay to UK FSA’s AII Deadline for Derivative Transaction Reporting

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has just announced yet another delay to the go live date for transaction reporting using the Alternative Instrument Identifier (AII). The deadline was delayed from November 2008 to the first quarter of 2009, then another announcement in February this year delayed the deadline by which approved reporting mechanisms (ARMs) must adopt AII codes until 21 September. Obviously, this third deadline has not been met and ARMs now have until “early” February 2010 to get ready.

Rather than being caused by a lack of industry readiness, these delays have resulted from the fact the FSA is not yet ready to start accepting the new AII reports. The regulator indicates it has experienced a “number of difficulties” in rolling out its system for processing these reports and has therefore been forced to engage in a “re-planning exercise”.

The deadlines have now been staggered so that the FSA will be ready to start accepting AII reports in February, but it will not be mandatory for firms to report AII transactions until early April. The FSA has confirmed that in the interim period it will take no action against firms who are unable to meet the February date for AII transaction reporting. The regulator has also set up a number of industry support groups and resources, including hosting a new Transaction Reporting Forum, which covers AII and general transaction reporting quality issues, in order to help firms comply.

The delays are indicative of the amount of work the regulator is currently engaged in; other competing priorities such as the incoming liquidity risk measurement regime must be causing conflicts of resources.

The Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) had originally wanted each competent authority (CA) to collect this information and share relevant reports with other CAs by November 2008, one year after MiFID went live. However, the FSA and ARMs have found the practical reality of implementation is much harder than first thought. Industry members have said they need more time to build, test and implement the required system changes in order to meet AII transaction reporting requirements.

The FSA has previously stated that it is worried that rushing implementation could adversely impact the quality of these transaction reports. The wider testing window will also allow end to end testing between ARMs and their client firms.

The key objectives of the FSA’s AII project are to meet MiFID obligations for reporting all AII derivatives transactions in an efficient and secure manner. Additionally, all reference data must be obtained in order to understand, validate and route transaction reports to the relevant CA according to MiFID’s criteria.

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Getting ready for Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and ESG – what action should asset managers be taking now?

Date: 8 June 2021 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Interest in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investment has exploded in recent years, bringing with it regulation and a requirement for buy-side firms to develop ESG strategies and meet disclosure obligations. The sell-side can help here by integrating ESG...

BLOG

Fund Managers Need a New Approach to Data to Overcome the Coronavirus Crisis

By Angie Walker, Global Head of Capital Markets Business Development at R3. Businesses across the globe have implemented digital transformation strategies on an unprecedented scale as they battle against the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic – and fund managers are no exception. Fundamental digital transformation requires a totally new approach to the way in which data...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

The Data Management Summit Virtual explores how financial institutions are shifting from defensive to offensive data management strategies, to improve operational efficiency and revenue enhancing opportunities. We’ll be putting the business lens on data and deep diving into the data management capabilities needed to deliver on business outcomes.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2020/2021 – Eighth Edition

This eighth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook is a ‘must-have’ for capital markets participants during this period of unprecedented change. Available free of charge, it profiles every regulation that impacts capital markets data management practices giving you: A detailed overview of each regulation with key dates, data and data management implications, links to...