About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

AML Fines Increase by 160%, Finds Fenergo

Subscribe to our newsletter

Between October 2018 and December 2019, regulators across the US, Europe, APAC and the Middle East have levied over $10 billion in financial penalties against financial institutions for AML/KYC and sanctions-related violations and a further $82.7 million for data privacy and MiFID violations, according to Fenergo’s latest analysis of global regulatory fines for AML, KYC, sanctions, MiFID, and data privacy violations against financial institutions.

In total, global financial firms have paid out over $36 billion in fines for AML, KYC and sanctions violations since the financial crisis of 2008. Notably, 2019 was the second-biggest year in history for fines with $8.4 billion levied against global financial institutions – and fines related to AML, KYC and sanctions violations were up by 160% from 2018.

“Across the world, regulators are stepping up activity to address money laundering and terrorist financing and the ineffective policies and procedures in place to address these risks,” finds the report. “As a catalyst, fine values appear to be increasing to the point where they are making punitive inroads into the profit margins of financial institutions. The largest fine issued in 2019 at $5.1 billion exceeded the offending bank’s annual net profit. In previous years, questions were raised about the effectiveness of financial penalties and, in the case of one UK-headquartered bank, a fine for AML breaches amounted to just eight days’ profit.”

The data underlines the need for financial institutions to harness technology to improve processes and controls for AML and KYC compliance, including the ability to understand complex entity ownership structures, conduct robust risk assessments and identify relationships with high risk clients.

“When you consider all the other challenges financial institutions are faced with today – including digital disruption and the battle to win on customer experience – the sector has reached a crossroads,” says Laura Glynn, Director of Regulatory Compliance at Fenergo.

“Never has it been more important to embrace new technologies that automate and streamline the compliance process. In this way, financial institutions can future-proof their organizations against upcoming and evolving regulation, enabling them to focus resources on revenue generating tasks, while creating truly differentiated customer experiences.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best practices for metadata management

Metadata has become central to financial firms as a means of enriching, discovering and effectively using both business and technical data. Its management is equally important, particularly in capital markets applications such as data lineage and data governance, which require a clear view of data and its provenance, and the ability to scale and support...

BLOG

Regulator-First AI: Vivox Brings Atomic Workflows to Compliance Operations

Artificial intelligence has become a default talking point in financial crime compliance. Yet for many regulated firms, particularly those operating across capital markets, payments, and treasury functions, the challenge is no longer whether AI can be used, but whether it can be deployed in a way regulators will accept. For Vivox AI, a young company...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

Applications of Reference Data to the Middle Office

Increasing volumes and the complexity of reference data in the post-crisis environment have left the middle office struggling to meet the requirements of the current market order. Middle office functions must therefore be robust enough to be able to deal with the spectre of globalisation, an increase in the use of esoteric security types and...