The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

All Along the Watchtower: How MiFID II’s Impact on the Front Office Is Driving Banks to Mutualise

By Dan Barnes

Bob Dylan’s lyric, ‘There’s too much confusion, I can’t get no relief,’ resonates in the world of capital markets. It encapsulates the relentless regulatory and systemic turbulence.

Under the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) coming into force in 2018, firms active in Europe will be hit with many new layers of process over existing mechanisms and completely new activities.

Project Sentinel is intended to reduce the challenge this presents for banks in the over-the-counter (OTC) front office. OTC trading was virtually absent from the first MiFID in 2007 and its inclusion in the 2018 directive expands the rules to capture a range of instruments and activities.

“Sentinel is very focussed on leveraging open standards to allow interoperability of components within Sentinel and components that banks have in their existing systems,” says Sassan Danesh, managing partner at Etrading Software, which is running the project on behalf of the banks.

It intends to develop shared technologies that at once provide sell-side firms with a resource that can assist in MiFID II compliance while mutualising the cost of compliance. The group recently announced that membership had grown to 10 sell-side firms.

Fred Ponzo, managing partner at consultancy GreySpark Partners. “The really big banks have the economies of scale to make the investment to comply with MiFID II pay off; the smaller firms they are really struggling. Therefore, sharing the overhead across three or four would be advantageous, across 10 will clearly help.”

The potential of the model is not lost, even on larger firms. Mark Goodman, head of foreign exchange, rates and credit (FRC) direct execution services at UBS says, “Sentinel certainly has some value in the mutualisation of cost in the face of regulation. We aren’t part of it but we certainly keep an eye on it to see what it might do for us. We see cost pressures increasing on the sell side, we see increasing cooperation around ‘utility functions’ that do not offer a competitive advantage.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing the transaction reporting landscape post Brexit: MiFID II, SFTR, EMIR

The transaction reporting landscape has, for many financial institutions, expanded considerably in size since the end of the UK’s Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the resulting need for double reporting of some transactions to both EU and UK authorities. It has also changed dramatically following the UK government’s failure to reach equivalence...

BLOG

Are You Ready for Brexit?

Things might be up in the air at the moment around Brexit negotiations, but the UK financial regulators have made it very clear that firms must be ready for the final deadline on December 31, 2020 or risk facing the consequences. Firms that don’t prepare in advance for the changing regulatory environment could face tough...

EVENT

Data Management Summit USA Virtual

Now in its 11th year, the Data Management Summit USA Virtual explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – A Solution for Entity Data?

The Global LEI System – or GLEIS – has been in development since the middle of last year. Development has been patchy at times, but much has been done, leaving fewer outstanding issues, but also raising new questions. What’s emerging is a structure for the GLEIS going forward, complete with a mechanism for registering and...