The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Algorithmics’ Response to Federal Banking Agencies Stress Testing Guidance

In its recent response to the Federal Banking Regulatory Agencies guidance document, ‘Proposed Guidance on Stress Testing for Banking Organizations with More Than $10 Billion in Total Consolidated Assets’, Algorithmics comments that the greatest challenge for banks will be in rising up out of the risk silos to perform enterprise-wide stress testing. Algorithmics notes that if banks can aggregate their product and counterparty risk they can not only comply, but can also avoid the dangers that come from risk segregation – such as duplication and mismanagement if potential risk diversification and concentration effects are not taken into account.

Dr Mario Onorato, Senior Director of Balance Sheet & Capital Management Solutions at Algorithmics and Honorary Senior Lecturer, Cass Business School in London, said: “It is clear that banks need to move away from their, in the main, siloed approach to risk management. To achieve this, senior management and the board must actively participate in implementing an institution’s enterprise-wide integrated stress testing framework, including scenario selection, and also ensuring that there is a robust stress testing infrastructure with appropriate IT systems and resources in place. In my opinion, the most important elements of the guidance are the requirement for banks to implement enterprise-wide and reverse stress testing frameworks, since both of these approaches will allow banks to rise above the silos to perform fully integrated stress testing.”

Algorithmics’ response focused on:

  • Reverse Stress Testing
  • Few institutions have the technological ability to undertake reverse stress tests and will require significant effort to build and incorporate this into their overall stress testing framework. Banks will need additional clarity on how the Agencies intend to use the results, and the need for consistency with other international regulators.
  • Regulatory arbitrage will become a danger. To avoid it, Algorithmics recommends the Agencies should create minimum common scenarios which all organizations will need to incorporate on top of their current stress testing programs.
  • Need for stress testing benchmarks
  • Because stress testing frameworks differ widely between institutions with different activities and contexts, and because local credit conditions vary, Algorithmics recommends that some standard stress coefficients or models should be suggested by the Agencies as a benchmark.

Dr Onorato concluded: “Banking is an international business and it is essential that there is consistency in regulation worldwide if regulatory arbitrage is to be prevented. The Agencies’ proposal differs from Basel and FAS by not acknowledging the need for common supervisory scenarios for banks to report under. It is important for banking organizations to realize that not all banking failures are driven by lack of capital. Operational risks or changes in the market perception of an institution can also cause institutional failure and these factors must also be included in the enterprise stress testing framework.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: What the LEI Means for your Firm

This webinar has passed, but you can view the recording here. This A-Team Webinar looks at the implications of the emerging legal entity identifier (LEI) for financial institutions as they address how to implement the new standard, and offers suggestions on best practices as the LEI becomes available. The industry initiative to develop and promote...

BLOG

A-Team Group Names Winners of Data Management Insight Awards 2020

A-Team Group has announced the winners of its prestigious Data Management Insight Awards 2020. The annual awards, now in their eighth year, recognise leading providers of data management solutions, services and consultancy to capital markets participants. The award winners were announced online across categories ranging from best sell-side and buy-side data management platforms to best...

EVENT

Data Management Summit Virtual

The Data Management Summit Virtual will bring together the global data management community to share lessons learned, best practice guidance and latest innovations to emerge from the recent crisis. Join us online to hear from leading data practitioners and innovators from the UK, US and Europe who will share insights into how they are pushing the boundaries with data to deliver value with flexible but resilient data driven strategies.

GUIDE

Directory of MiFID II Electronic Trading Venues 2018

The inaugural edition of A-Team Group’s Directory of MiFID II Electronic Trading Venues 2018 offers a guide to the European landscape resulting from new market structure introduced by the January 3, 2018 implementation of Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II). The directory provides detailed profiles of more than 70 venue operators and their...