About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

DG FISMA Rejects the ESAs’ Draft RTS for DORA

Subscribe to our newsletter

Less than one week after the Digital Operations Resilience Act (DORA) came into full force in the EU, the Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union (DG FISMA) issued a letter to the Chair of the Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) rejecting the draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) submitted earlier in July.

Collectively, the ESAs—European Banking Authority (ABA), European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), are responsible for developing the RTS to ensure consistent application of DORA across EU member states. DG FISMA is the branch of the European Commission tasked with ensuring financial stability, market integrity, and the implementation of EU financial policies.

DG FISMA rejected the draft RTS, noting that certain sections, particularly Article 5, exceeded DORA’s legislative requirements. Article 5 mandates financial entities to identify and maintain an up-to-date record of the entire chain of subcontractor dependencies for Information and Communications Technology (ICT) vendors, a requirement deemed overly broad and burdensome. DG FISMA recommended the removal of Article 5 and related recitals to align the RTS with DORA’s mandate.

The rejection has created legal uncertainty across the EU. Financial entities and ICT service providers that have already implemented the draft RTS in their contractual arrangements are now in a difficult position, as amendments to these contracts may be required in the near future. Firms are now facing a longer wait before they can finalize their contracts to reflect DORA’s requirements, even though the legislation is already in effect, increasing the risk of non-compliance.

Next Steps:

The ESAs have a six-week period  from the date of DG FISMA’s letter—January 21—to amend the draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) in accordance with the feedback provided by the European Commission, particularly addressing concerns that certain provisions exceeded their mandate.

Upon completing the revisions, the ESAs are required to resubmit the amended draft RTS to the European Commission for approval. Should the Commission accept the revised RTS, it will then be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council for scrutiny. Assuming no objections arise, the RTS will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and will take effect 20 days thereafter.

In the event that the ESAs do not submit an amended draft within the six-week timeframe, or if the revisions fail to meet the Commission’s requirements, the Commission may either adopt the RTS with its own amendments or reject it entirely. The six-week revision period ending on March 4, and the subsequent procedural steps, could extend the finalization and adoption of the RTS into the second quarter of 2025. This timeline is subject to the ESAs’ timely revisions and the absence of further objections during the approval process.

Supply Chain Risk

Supply chain risk management is well advanced in other regulated industries. In the pharmaceutical sector for example, supply chain integrity is key to ensuring product safety and efficacy. Regulations mandate stringent controls over the sourcing, manufacturing, and distribution processes. For instance, the U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA) requires the establishment of electronic systems to trace prescription medications throughout the supply chain, aiming to prevent counterfeit drugs from entering the market.

Many RegTech vendors already cite global standards for their cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) solutions. Among the most frequently cited standards is SOC 2, which evaluates controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

Similarly, ISO/IEC 27001 is an international standard that specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), providing a systematic approach to managing sensitive information securely.

ISO 28000:2022 is designed for the supply chain, applicable to organizations of all types and sizes, regardless of the industry, providing a comprehensive framework to improve security management systems.

It remains to be seen how supply chain risk will be regulated across the EU under DORA.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Managing Legacy Voice Recording Transition

2 July 2025 10:00am ET | 3:00pm London | 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 Minutes Recent enforcement actions underscore the importance of maintaining accurate, secure and up-to-date voice and electronic communication. For some organisations, legacy voice recording systems are not at or beyond end-of-life, posing significant compliance, operational and financial risks. These outdated systems often fail...

BLOG

Kaizen and RegGenome Partner to Streamline Global Regulatory Intelligence

Reg reporting specialist Kaizen has forged a partnership with RegGenome, a spin-out from the University of Cambridge and a founding member of the open-source Regulatory Genome Project (RGP), aimed at helping financial institutions navigate complex global regulations. The tie-in combines RegGenome’s AI-powered regulatory data repository with Kaizen’s award-winning Single Rulebook platform. The partnership leverages the complementary...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...