About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Giving Away the Value of Reference Data

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Chris Pickles, Co-Chair of FIX Trading Community’s Reference Data Subgroup and Member of the Bloomberg Open Symbology Team

Reference data is not only a foundation of data management, it is also a revenue earning commodity, particularly for exchanges and issuers of ISINs. MiFIR requires exchanges, multilateral trading facilities, organised trading facilities and systematic internalisers to deliver defined reference data to national regulators for every financial instrument that is admitted to trading on their venue. It doesn’t matter if the instrument ever trades on that venue; if it is admitted to trading, the reference data has to be delivered.

A first surprise about ESMA’s approach to reference data was its decision to mandate the use of ISINs alone for transaction reporting, particularly after ESMA itself made it clear that it understood that ISINs aren’t widely used by the industry for instruments such as derivatives. Also, ISINs are often fee liable in one form or another.

ESMA has now delivered a second surprise by clarifying that it will be making all of the reference data available via its website, not only to national regulators in the European Union, but to the whole world.

The reference data in question generally has ownership rights and/or intellectual property rights attached to it. It is created by issuers, trading venues and domestic numbering agencies, and it is licensed to users and vendors either on its own or within packages of data. ESMA has said MiFIR requires ESMA to publish all of this reference data and that ‘publish’ means ‘to everyone’. But MiFIR does not say that ESMA has to take and give away all of the data for free, which is particularly relevant when it belongs to other parties.

Both MiFID I and MiFID II require investment firms to publish trade data, but allow them to do so on a ‘reasonable commercial basis’. ESMA is not making it clear if, and how, it intends to address this same issue for reference data, in terms of licensing, fee liability, access control, billing and revenue sharing.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Sponsored by FundGuard: NAV Resilience Under DORA, A Year of Lessons Learned

The EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) came into force a year ago, and is reshaping how asset managers, asset owners and fund service providers think about operational risk. While DORA’s focus is squarely on ICT resilience and third-party dependencies, its implications extend deep into core operational processes that are critical to market integrity, investor...

BLOG

World Federation of Exchanges Urges Regulators to Balance Quantum Risk with Near-Term Cyber and AI Threats

The World Federation of Exchanges (WFE) has called on regulators to balance long-term quantum computing risks against more immediate operational challenges in the financial sector. The association’s press release highlights a substantial gap between regulatory expectations for early preparation and the industry’s current prioritisation of nearer-term threats such as generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and cyber...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 15th year the Data Management Summit NYC brings together the North American data management community to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

What the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Will Mean for Your Firm

It’s hard to believe that as early as the 2009 Group of 20 summit in Pittsburgh the industry had recognised the need for greater transparency as part of a wider package of reforms aimed at mitigating the systemic risk posed by the OTC derivatives market. That realisation ultimately led to the Dodd Frank Act, and...