A-Team Insight Blogs

LSE in Talks with Refinitiv on $27 Billion Merger Deal

Share article

News broke over the weekend that the London Stock Exchange (LSE) is in talks with Refinitiv to take over the former risk and finance unit of Thomson Reuters, in a transaction valued at $27 billion.

Should it come to pass – and given the specificity of press reports, it seems it most likely will – the transaction will yield Refinitiv owners $7 billion in a year. As they say: nice work if you can get it.

But what will LSE get for its money, and what would a combined LSE-Refinitiv look like?

While most of the mainstream press has suggested the move will bolster LSE’s information services activities – as a hedge against declining revenues from traditional exchange activities like listing and trading – it’s worth remembering that LSE was once a Top Three market data terminal provider for the London marketplace, along with Reuters and the long-defunct Telerate. LSE spun off the bulk of its lucrative market data business to ICV (later part of the Primark group that was gobbled up by Thomson Financial) and Telekurs (the Swiss data vendor that is now part of SIX Group).

As such, any acquisition of Refinitiv would mark a return to familiar pastures for the LSE. It would also follow a similar route set by ICE, which acquired Interactive Data Corp. to bring itself back into the financial information space, having spun off the New York Stock Exchange’s NYSE Technologies unit to SR Labs (now Vela) soon after buying the exchange.

For the LSE, Refinitiv would bring a substantial desktop terminal business in the form of Eikon, and an established data delivery and hosting infrastructure in the form of Elektron. It would also bring significant products in the analysis and big data space, as well as a number of FX-oriented execution venues, Deutsche Boerse having announced at the weekend it was dropping its bid for FXall (Refinitiv also operates interbank order-matching systems in the FX marketplace).

For its part, the LSE already operates a wholesale market data business (via the sale of its real-time market data for its trading markets in equities and fixed income), and offers high-performance connectivity and colocation services for institutional players. Adding Refinitiv’s terminal, data feed and hosting businesses would certainly bolster this area of the business. But some questions remain that doubtless will come out in the wash of a final deal.

It seems unlikely (and probably contractually impossible), for example, that LSE would seek to offer its data exclusively via Refinitiv terminals and data feeds, as some observers have suggested. Also, it’s not clear what future the LSE’s fundamental data offerings would face, given Refinitiv’s extensive offerings in this space.

The status of Thomson Reuters’ 30-year deal to provide news services to Refinitiv may also come under review, especially given Dow Jones’ recent agreement to provide Bloomberg with its news services – at a significantly lower price than TR’s existing contract with Blackstone, according to sources familiar with the arrangement. Some observers have suggested Thomson Reuters is keen to include the news organisation within the LSE deal, but it’s not clear how an exchange could operate a news agency tasked with reporting on the performance of its listed companies without falling foul of regulators.

For both organisations, though, the transaction could be a conduit for the kind of digital transformation to modern delivery technologies that clients are asking for. Both have in common the fact that their primary London data centres are approaching end of life, and a merger could create the opportunity for a true migration to the cloud for appropriate services while establishing state-of-the-art hosting and management for high-performance and critical activities like market data and order-matching.

The devil, they say, is in the detail. We are looking forward to learning more as details of the final deal emerge in the coming days and weeks.

One Reply to “LSE in Talks with Refinitiv on $27 Billion Merger Deal”

  1. Not positive for buy-side market data managers- fees and licences will continue to explode as is already the case with FTSE today. Further stress for the buyside in Terms of data Management expenditure can be expected because of LSE looking for more revenue improvement e.g. through audits . At the same time products and services are not likely to improve as the deal needs to be paid for. Some buyside firms are already looking for replacement options.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Listen to two buy-side CDOs discussing how to get data management right

Is your firm struggling to get cost-efficient data management in place to meet both strategy and regulatory requirements? Could innovative data management help to deliver much-needed business growth at your firm? Are you short of resources and skills to implement best practice data management? If your answer to any of these questions is yes, you...

BLOG

ICE Clear Europe Set to Weather a No-Deal Brexit

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has been recognised as a third-country central counterparty in accordance with European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), which means that in the event of a no-deal Brexit, ICE Clear Europe can continue to service all its clearing members and customers, including those based in the EU. In the absence of a withdrawal agreement...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York City

The TradingTech Summit is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and explores progress trading firms are making towards digital transformation initiatives and how they are using high performance technologies to gain an edge in the current regulatory environment.

GUIDE

Entity Data Management Handbook – Fifth Edition

Welcome to the fifth edition of A-Team Group’s Entity Data Management Handbook, sponsored for the fourth year running by entity data specialist Bureau van Dijk, a Moody’s Analytics Company. The past year has seen a crackdown on corporate responsibility for financial crime – with financial firms facing draconian fines for non-compliance and the very real...