About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Industry Calls for SFTR, EMIR Refit Delay

Subscribe to our newsletter

Following a letter from trade bodies including the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) and the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) this week, EU regulator ESMA is expected to issue clarification on whether it might consider a six-month delay to the upcoming Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (SFTR) currently due to go live in April.

The joint letter requests that the first phase of reporting be pushed back to October, a decision that rests with the European Commission, although ESMA is able to make recommendations. “The impact on personnel involved in SFTR implementation programmes, compounded by pressures on firms caused by the associated surges in market volatility and volumes, has reached a point where firms believe that their capacity to ensure compliance with the requirements as of 11 April has been critically compromised,” stressed the trade associations in the letter of 16 March.

In the absence of a formal delay, the industry has asked ESMA, at a minimum, to consider equivalent measures that would provide “forbearance and sufficient reassurance for firms that they are not expected by ESMA and their respective NCA to ensure strict compliance with SFTR reporting obligations” for an appropriate period of time following the legal reporting start date – suggesting that October would again be an appropriate time to resume enforcement.

It is understood that EMSA has acknowledged these concerns, and promised to provide clarification, expected by the end of the week. But it is not jut SFTR that is a concern. Banks contacted by RegTech Insight have also raised issues around the EMIR Refit, suggesting that this too should be delayed by six months. From 18 June, financial counterparties who trade with a non-financial counterparty (NFC) will be required to report the transactions on behalf of the NFC (mandatory reporting), unless it elects in advance to make its own report – and problems are already anticipated.

“Although it’s an easier job [than SFTR], we expect many of our clients to be massively impacted by the virus, which will affect their ability to give us feedback,” explained one compliance head to RegTech Insight, on condition of anonymity. “It’s not an implementation problem – we can turn on delegated reporting at the flick of a switch. But the quality of data is a concern – we need our clients to tell us what needs to be on their half of the report, and we have serious doubts about their ability to do that. We have asked the trade associations to contact ESMA on this directly, as they did for SFTR – and to be honest, it’s a bit odd that no one else has thought of this yet.”

ESMA, which started remote working for all its staff from Monday 16 March, has indicated its support for firms during the current crisis, confirming in a statement on 11 March that it was “prepared to use its powers to ensure the orderly functioning of markets, financial stability and investor protection,” and recommending that all financial services firms should be ready to deploy Business Continuity Measures (BCM); disclose as soon as possible any relevant information concerning the impacts of COVID-19 on their fundamentals, prospects or financial situation in accordance with their transparency obligations under the Market Abuse Regulation; and provide transparency on the impact of COVID-19 in their interim and 2019 end-of-year financial reports.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best practices for compliance with EU Market Abuse Regulation

Date: 18 June 2024 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) came into force in July 2016, rescinding the previous Market Abuse Directive and replacing it with a significantly extended scope of regulatory obligations. Eight years later, and amid constant change in capital markets regulation,...

BLOG

Corlytics Reports Eye-Watering Fines for 2023 Regulatory Breaches

Corlytics, a provider of regulatory risk intelligence, has released an enforcement data report for 2023 revealing financial crime, data protection, and governance as the main risk categories for financial services with the highest penalties. Some $6.7 billion of fines were imposed for financial crime, most of which were for money laundering and terrorist financing. Looking...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 14th year the Data Management Summit NYC brings together the North American data management community to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2023 – Eleventh Edition

Welcome to the eleventh edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a popular publication that covers new regulations in capital markets, tracks regulatory change, and provides advice on the data, data management and implementation requirements of more than 30 regulations across UK, European, US and Asia-Pacific capital markets. This edition of the handbook includes new...