About a-team Marketing Services

A-Team Insight Blogs

RegTech is Only as Good as the Data it Uses, Summit Told

Subscribe to our newsletter

While technology has automated regulatory compliance for financial institutions, vendors and users must vigilantly stay on top of the data behind it to adjust to changes in the laws they seek to address.

New or different datasets and formats must be accommodated, and new data sources found as regulators redraw rules to protect participants in fast-changing marketplaces.

In a fascinating discussion of the topic at A-Team Group’s recent RegTech Summit APAC, held in Singapore, Mohammed Rahim, global head of data management at Standard Chartered Bank, said banks needed to heed two crucial approaches to meet the data challenge.

Setting out his philosophy that data should simply enable business strategies, not drive them, Rahim argued that simplicity is the best approach to adaptation.

Two Needs

RegTech tools needed to possess capabilities to read, understand and interpret regulations and to discover and interrogate the relevant data from banks’ own repositories and from those of vendors. In this way, banks could approach the nuances of regulation in a singular catch-all manner (in a later presentation, Mary Anne Bullock, global strategic account director at Solidatus, referred to such challenges as the “battle against complexity”).

Instead of focusing on tools that are finely tuned to meeting the requirements of specific laws, Rahim argued that it was more logical to seek off-the-shelf solutions that could be easily tweaked to suit different needs.

Substantial customisation, he said, could in fact be counterproductive. Highly individualised solutions are very good, but they become useless and very expensive when the regulation to which they are tailored is changed.

These “extreme customisations” are difficult to “reverse out of”, he said.

Rahim went on to explain how these and other pitfalls could be better managed if banks embarked on a regulatory-change programme, in which processes are put in place to provide automatically for the interpretation and response to changes in oversight rules. That would include establishing routes to embedding proposals into policy and engaging with regulators to communicate any compliance difficulties that the changes would create.

Local Rules

For international banks – such as Standard Chartered, which operates in 60 jurisdictions – a certain level of customisation of RegTech processes was nevertheless essential, Rahim said in the summit’s fireside conversation with Irene Liu, APAC board co-chair/managing director, strategy and consulting at EDM Council/Accenture.

They need to be sensitive to the local requirements and expectations of each market in which they operate. That could largely be managed agilely with minimal customisation, Rahim said.

For instance, by configuring all compliance processes to the requirements of the strictest authority within a region, banks can ensure they are almost universally compliant without the need for extensive retooling of their RegTech platforms.

Rahim recommended that organisations also maintain a dialogue with regulators to ensure they know what is expected of them and to engage with peers and competitors to see how others are managing compliance.

Local Laws

This process needs to be carefully applied where jurisdictions have data localisation rules, which usually prevent the transfer and use of data from one country to another.

In these cases, it’s useful to adopt a RegTech solution that manages the issue’s constituent challenges separately. These would usually amount to platforms that can document and understand the nuances across regulations; hold a local copy of the data; manage data-sharing exclusions, including the updating of vendor and third-party data contracts; and carefully configure access controls.

Here, too, Rahim’s two laws of RegTech apply, albeit with minor adaptation. The necessary data should be discovered and obtained in ways that makes it easy to integrate with other datasets, and that should then be mapped to the nuances found across the different jurisdictions.

He concluded by affirming the essential benefits of RegTech ­­– accuracy and automation of compliance – while also stressing the importance of ensuring that all members of a bank’s teams understood the need for maintaining the quality and relevance of data.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best practices for compliance with EU Market Abuse Regulation

Date: 18 June 2024 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) came into force in July 2016, rescinding the previous Market Abuse Directive and replacing it with a significantly extended scope of regulatory obligations. Eight years later, and amid constant change in capital markets regulation,...

BLOG

FCA Criticism of Funds’ SDR Approach Stirs Controversy

The UK regulator has criticised fund managers for failing to abide by interim guidance on ESG disclosures just days before it’s expected to announce details of a formal regulation. But the comments have been met with frustration and caution within the ESG data and technology community, with one practitioner arguing that the Financial Conduct Authority...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 14th year the Data Management Summit NYC brings together the North American data management community to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2023 – Eleventh Edition

Welcome to the eleventh edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a popular publication that covers new regulations in capital markets, tracks regulatory change, and provides advice on the data, data management and implementation requirements of more than 30 regulations across UK, European, US and Asia-Pacific capital markets. This edition of the handbook includes new...